Sex.can.be.many.things, depending on your perspective. Something functional, something fun, something sinful or something holy. Does it make any sense to try to define what sex “should” be? What form might “sacred” sex, of the kind Seldon describes, take? Can it ever come from casual encounters? Does a prescriptive take on sex do more harm than good?
Read more…..
Does sex have to be sacred to be meaningful? | Open thread | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk.